Ranger shows us that sharing DMs is okay in certain circumstances ;)

Another marvelous misadventure of Alexander, my incognito account in tulpa.info.

I reply to message of no consequences to Ranger. And she says that we have agreed in DM to not talk to each other.

I reply to her that she has blocked me, so she doesn’t receive pings anyway and it’s not my responsibility to care about it, unless I use tupperbox to circumvent a block I’m aware of, which I didn’t. I also call Ranger out on forging a covert contract between us as there haven’t been such an agreement between us I’m aware of and consented to.

Lucilyn says that I did consent with :thumbsup: reaction. Which implies that Ranger shared our DM with her.

I call Ranger out on sharing our DM without my consent. Lucilyn explains that it’s moderation so it’s okay…

Here An tries to provoke me as she’s obviously aware who I really am. I ignore it. Nothing of consequence happens after that I guess.

Anyway, Ranger has showed here that sharing DMs is okay and another member of tulpa.info staff agreed with it, even if from her point of view I didn’t really do anything wrong. Still, it’s a precedent of sharing DMs being justified in certain circumstances. And I believe showing the proof of actual abusive behavior is at least as justified. And as tulpa.info staff, including its owner, happens to be accused of being main abuser’s accomplices, the only higher instance left is the public.

Here is a DM that was supposed to prove our agreement. I put a :thumbsup: below a message saying to not talk to Ranger indeed. From my point of view back then a context of that was our DM that evening. I’ve never explicitly said I’m not going to talk to Ranger at all.