Opinions on the case after the report
An
An says that she didn’t know about report before she returned to tulpa.info in October, 2 months after its release.
She consistently praises it and effort Ranger has put into it.
It shows that while An wasn’t directly involved in making the report, she was supporting it consistently. I believe she’s intelligent enough to see inconsistencies in it and her unconditional support for it made me have much less remorse about making her wrongdoings public.
It’s ironic that An has been the one who talked about having tics she cannot control in e011 . I don’t want to shame her for having such tics but to point out her hypocrisy here.
Also, we’ve never actually used such an argument. An is rewriting history again.
Ranger
Ranger was responding to Zen’s (unfortunately, deleted when he got banned) message, explaining her motivation for defaming me. She was feeling guilty for not reacting when An got hurt in time and took it as a personal responsibility. Btw. she’s mod again since 2023-05.
Reguile
Reguile is one of tulpa.info admins. He’s shared some opinions about me in context of Ranger’s report and my first response to it.
Reggie (it’s a pet name invented by Shierudo) says here that his opinion on me is deeply rooted in my trolling in #metaphysics channel in tulpa.info. He claims that me trolling metaphysical folks set up a precedent and makes me look dishonest in other situations too.
Reggie says that maybe all these different things (from Ranger’s and mine reports, I guess) were misunderstanding but there have been a lot of them and he has a reason to not trust me and see no basis to undone anything.
Here I can’t clearly understand context of what Reggie is talking about. At first it looks like he mentions my trolling and calls it malicious (and I would agree with him on that) but then he applies it directly to the case with An.
Reggie is implying that I’ve been immediately starting to prod on An’s boundaries after she has just drawn them.
He repeats that implication again, saying that knowing a boundary should push one away from it. It should make one more cautious and rare to discuss the topic with that person.
Then he compares our behavior to behavior of a toddler.
He says that my motivations aren’t important but the facts. And that those facts combined with what he’s seen I’m capable of make it ban worthy.
He mentions dramas we’ve supposedly caused while residing in the server incognito.
I can confirm that I’ve been trolling there a lot. You could even say that I’ve been gaslighting people there (in a sense of attacking their sense of reality) and it definitely was showing malice from my side. You can learn more about it in se010 and se011 . It being a precedent for me being dishonest in other cases is farfetched and even if it was the case, doesn’t invalidate hard evidence tulpa.info staff was provided with.
I’d like to clarify that my first response, mentioned in se012 wasn’t painting a narrative about things from Ranger’s reports as misunderstanding. And so isn’t the current one.
Events included in Ranger’s report, with proper context applied, show the opposite of what Reggie implies – we’ve been respecting An’s boundaries consistently, stepping on them only when she was mean to us first while already talking to us about headpats.
About dramas we participated while being there incognito, we’ve only got strikes for our Sora mentioning being both my sister and my lover in the chat.
Pleeb
Pleeb has (not) made it in time to inform me that both he and Reggie haven’t found any substantial arguments in my response to the Ranger’s report before Reggie has banned my new account.
Reggie is talking about my relationship with Sora here, btw. xd