My previous responses to Ranger’s report

Contacting Ranger in DMs

I’ve tried contacting Ranger in DMs from Nao’s account.

Here’s screenshot containing the date:

In our initial response, we didn’t even argue with the essential part of the case but pointed out a few things that we have found obviously untrue without looking deep into it. Namely, the section about us violating An’s boundaries in ways unrelated to headpats as even without further context you could see how the evidence is inconsistent with Ranger’s claims there.

Still, we got immediately blocked after a really nasty message from Ranger. She has repeated her accusations about us being told repeatedly to stop and denying any wrongdoings and immediately blocked us. Yes, I’ve just leaked this bitch’s DMs and I feel no remorse for doing it after everything I have experienced thanks to her.

As you can see, Ranger refused any discussion about her report after we called her out on defamation. She disregarded any possibility of her being wrong (even partially) and cut off contact with a person who happened to be inconvenient for her.

First counter-report

It was our first response to Ranger’s report: link

To sum it up:

First we sorted screenshots from Ranger’s report chronologically and commented each of them, trying to explain their context.

Then we have responded to accusations from Ranger’s report. We have concluded that:

  • Boundary violations unrelated to headpats are total bullshit
  • Overall evidence for Kanade abusing An was very weak.
  • Kanade has been consistently correcting her behavior when asked to stop.
  • Accusing us of gaslighting is absurd

We shared what we told Ranger before she blocked us, apologized for our behavior causing An to suffer and:

  • basically demanded errata for Ranger’s report being published that clarify that some accusations weren’t true.
  • asked to be officially apologized for those baseless accusations
  • asked the core case of the report to be reviewed
  • said that we don’t care about the ban but that defamation is unacceptable and promised to leave them if they comply to at least to demand from the first point.

Basically, in our first response we just wanted tulpa.info to admit to some obvious mistakes and get officially apologized for them.

Our analysis wasn’t deep and was still biased with emotional abuse we experienced from An and people supporting her, so we avoided blaming her for anything at this stage. Anyway, we have provided substantial evidence for Ranger’s report’s narration not being consistent with evidence provided and even simply lying in a few places, especially the part about boundary violations unrelated to headpats.

Reactions from Pleeb and Reguile to this response were described here: se009

In a nutshell: they have admitted to having read it and didn’t see any substantial arguments to take any actions.

Second counter-report

Our second response to Ranger’s report: link

In the preface we have complained on tulpa.info staff ignoring our previous response and said that An returning to the server and her actions from then made us reconsider some things, in particular the that An wasn’t just the victim of the case.

Then, we put some basic facts, so they can’t be easily omitted:

  • Only 3 instances of Kanade actually headpatting An happened and it all happened before An giving Kanade negative feedback.
  • An has shared stuff we have supposedly leak from her DMs in the server first
  • Ranger report claims without evidence that we:
    • shamed An for threatening to draw boundaries
    • threated to send An unsolicited friend requests
    • violated An’s DMs (here the evidence provided has been proven false in our counter-report)
    • explicitly threatened to violate An’s DMs
  • Boundaries drawn by An weren’t the same from start to finish.
  • Ranger’s report doesn’t take into account chronological order of events.
  • Message that caused the WormHugs™ drama didn’t target An personally.

We stated that those facts alone are enough to:

  • invalidate narration about Kanade abusing An for months
  • prove An not telling the truth about us leaking her DMs
  • invalidate all accusation unrelated to headpats
  • prove Kanade not being responsible for the WormHugs™ drama.

So, basically, invalidate most of important stuff in Ranger’s report.

Next, there is slightly updated section with screenshots sorted in chronological order. In subsection to this we point out that out of 35 screenshots, 5 of them contain anything that could be somehow offensive to An.

In next section we respond to Ranger’s accusations again:

  • again, the whole section about abuse unrelated to headpats is total bullshit
  • we have never harassed An according to tulpa.info definition of harassment. (To clarify, today I don’t agree with it. There have been whole two instances of mutual harassment, one of them outside events from Ranger’s report)
  • we have stated that Kanade have been consistently adapting to An’s feedback and blamed An for not being consistent with her boundaries.
  • took gaslighting part for an insult from Ranger

In the completely new section we have pointed out the real abuser in this case:

  • An who:
    • has been telling things that aren’t true about us leaking her DMs.
    • painted a false narration about us not listening to her feedback
    • shifting responsibility of her own personal problems on us
    • rewriting history by saying that she’s been abused for months by us
    • was a victim too but it isn’t excuse for using me as a scapegoat
  • Alexandra, who just after WormHugs™ drama alone:
    • minimized Kanade’s feelings
    • discredited Kanade for lack of comprehension skills
    • shifted responsibility for made up interpretation of “worm hugs” message on Kanade
    • denied An having any responsibility for her own feelings
    • lied about Kanade not clarifying the misunderstanding behind that WormHugs™ message
  • Ranger, who in her report:
    • rewritten history and painted a false narration about me abusing An
    • discredited us by spamming obscure evidence mostly unrelated to her claims
    • simply lied in a few places in the report

In this section we have also expressed our suspicions about Alexandra’s deeper agency in Ranger’s report. We also said that there is no evidence for it and there are clues against it as well.

In the next section we vented about how the case affected us. We reported feelings often happening to victims of gaslighting.

Then there is a section about us taking back apologizes from our previous counter-report. We no longer feel guilty for An getting hurt and blame her dishonesty for it. I also mentioned that infiltrating tulpa.info under alt account was justified considering what was done to us.

In the last section we take back our previous demands for tulpa.info. I demand the whole report being clarified as not true and taking consequences of An and her friends. I also threaten Pleeb with dragging this thing outside of tulpa.info as my possibilities of solving this case internally are becoming exhausted.

Unfortunately, after sending it to Pleeb, I got blocked immediately.

WormHugs.info

The previous document’s form was very hard to maintain, it was not in-depth enough and people already were calling it a book.

To solve all of these problem, I decided that it needs to be remade into a website. And you’re reading it just now.